top of page
搜尋
  • Candice Mak

刑事案上訴


梁智基上訊案件

律政司早前針對3宗被裁定控罪表證不成立、被告當庭獲釋的機場販毒案,要求上訴庭釐清表證不成立的法律標準,案件昨於上訴庭續審。律政司質疑,案中主審法官採用錯誤的法律標準,案件應該交由陪審團推論證供,而非由法官裁定表證不成立,導致審訊中斷。上訴庭亦關注,控方外聘大律師曾承認控方證據薄弱,律政司表示已跟進事件。


刑事事項方面,終審法院可酌情決定是否受理上訴法庭的最終決定,以及原訟法庭的最終決定,而就此項決定是不能向上訴法庭提出上訴的。

終審法院只會在下述情況才考慮酌情給予上訴許可,如:

  • 上訴法庭或原訟法庭(視屬何情況而定)證明有關案件的決定是涉及具有重大而廣泛的重要性的法律論點,(如較下級法院拒絕作出證明,終審法院本身仍可作出有關證明)或

  • 顯示可合理地爭辯曾有實質及嚴重的不公平情況。

如你對本署拒絕批出法援或其他所作的命令或決定(例如取消法援)感到受屈,你可向高等法院司法常務官提出上訴;如案件由終審法院審理,則可向由高等法院司法常務官、一名香港大律師公會代表及一名香港律師會代表組成的覆核委員會提出上訴。司法常務官或覆核委員會的決定為最終的決定。

在法院就上訴召開聆訊前,你會獲書面通知本署作出有關決定的原因。


Chief Justice Cheung:

1. I agree with the joint judgment of Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ and Mr Justice Gummow NPJ.

Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ and Mr Justice Gummow NPJ:

2. There has reached this Court litigation commenced by the Appellant (“P”) in 2012. It concerns family disputes respecting two parcels of land located in the Sha Kok Mei Village (“the Village”), Sai Kung, in the New Territories. The Cheung family are indigenous inhabitants of the Village. The land law in the New Territories in 1898 and its subsequent development provides the background to the issues in this litigation and has been traced in Winfat Enterprises (HK) Co Ltd v A-G [1983] HKLR 211, and on appeal [1985] 1 AC 733 at 744.

3. The first dispute relates to the parcel (“the Disputed Land”) being Lot 1101 in Demarcation District 221. The principal issues in this Court concern equitable doctrine and remedies, in particular the existence and incidents of proprietary estoppel in favour of the Third Respondent (“D3”).

4. The second dispute concerns Lot 774 on which a house is erected (“House 774”). House 774 is about two minutes walking distance from the Disputed Land. The First and Second Respondents (“D1” and “D2”) together hold a 1/3 undivided share in the land. P was born in 1960 (adopted in 1961). She grew up in House 774 and lives there with her daughter and granddaughter on the ground floor. She derives rental income from the other two floors. The trial judge ordered that P pay to D1 and D2 1/3 of that rental income from 1997 (the year of the death of P’s father) and 1/3 of the mesne profits from 1997 in respect of the ground floor.

Question 1



3 次查看0 則留言

最新文章

查看全部

窮小子的商業奇蹟

在一個小村莊裡,有一個叫做李明的年輕人。他出生在一個貧困的家庭,父母都是農民,生活十分艱難。從小,李明就對身邊的窮困環境感到不滿,他立志要改變自己和家人的命運。 李明自小就非常努力,總是排在班上的前幾名。儘管他的家庭無法負擔昂貴的教育費用,但他從不放棄學習。他每天都會利用上學路上的時間背書,晚上則熬夜自學。雖然辛苦,但他從未抱怨,因為他知道,只有通過知識才能改變命運。 隨著時間的推移,李明逐漸長大

Comments


bottom of page